Submission to the Working Holiday Maker review

In the 2015-16 Budget, the then-Abbott Government announced one of the largest ever increases in income tax for a cohort of taxpayers – working holiday makers. By changing their tax status from ‘resident’ to ‘non-resident’, the Government increased income taxes by 32.5 per cent on a population between 150,000 and 200,000 at any one time. No consultation, and apparently, no consideration of what this tax might do was undertaken.

In the 16 months since, the Government has failed to address the fundamental concerns from employers and migrants. Now the Department of Agriculture is tasked with reviewing the ‘backpacker tax’. While the Working Holiday program is on the surface about cultural exchange, over the past decade, it has transformed into an informal, unregulated low-skilled work visa for young people from predominantly OECD countries. To be blunt, this is transforming one of Australia’s more open immigration programs into a complete mess.

As an aside, the fact not a single National Party MP was able to identify this issue in the lead up to the 2015-16 Budget and then fail to stop this measure, shows how weak their political sway is when it comes to policies which actually matter in regional Australia.

Here is my submission to the Review – WHM Review – Ag Submission. It is a bit rusty given my lack of blogging combined with a very tight timeframe for submissions. I doubt there will be any positive outcomes from this process and instead, a small band-aid will patch over the serious policy issues of regional labour shortages. The summary of my submission is below the fold.

(Note: This is my first blog post in a while. From February 2016 until yesterday, I worked for a Shadow Labor Minister. It was a wonderful experience however a silver lining of finishing up is the opportunity to write publicly again.)

Summary

The Working Holiday Maker (WHM) program is a valuable part of Australia’s broader migration framework. The bilateral nature of the program facilitates immigration of people to Australia and the emigration of Australians overseas.

This is a unique, important contribution in migration policy. However, like many parts of migration policy in Australia, the WHM program is often viewed in isolation from other migration programs and policies. The program has traditionally been promoted as a way for Australia to engage in cultural exchange and deepen people to people links across the world.

Yet since the introduction of a second 12-month visa in 2005 as an incentive to address regional labour shortages, the Working Holiday Maker program has become an unregulated mess, fostering exploitation while also undercutting the migration program specifically designed to address regional labour shortages, the Seasonal Worker Program.

The program today is clearly used predominantly as an informal low-skilled labour migration scheme with very little regulatory oversight. The most important questions this review must address are: what is the purpose of the WHM program and does this align with the broader migration framework?

In answering these questions, despite the current heavy reliance of the horticultural industry on working holiday makers, the only sustainable way to address structural labour shortages is under the Seasonal Worker Program.

Advertisements

One thought on “Submission to the Working Holiday Maker review

  1. 1 : Henry, the only way that the backpacker worker program has become a ‘migration program’ is via backpackers working in Australia becoming partners & spouses of Australians. If you want to try and control that process, good luck ! But I suspect and policy that attempted to, will fail.

    2 : The Working Holiday program is only valid for people under 30 from 16 countries.All these countries are relatively weatlhy, westernised countries.Thus the temptation for young people from the countries to overstay their visas to gain increased wealth, is much reduced. If the program was widened to include young people from such less prosperous countries as PNG, Philippines, India, Pakistan, Indonesia etc. there would be a major blowout of over stayers and and black economy, low paid, cash workers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s