Every little trick in the book

The Law Council of Australia responds to the Migration Amendment Bill 2013 (Provisions):

“The Law Council of Australia regrets that it is unable to provide a submission in response to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee’s inquiry into the provisions of the Migration Amendment Bill 2013 (Cth) (the Bill) due to the short timeframe for making submissions.

By seeking to circumvent this decision, the Law Council is concerned that the amendments proposed in the Bill could place men, women and children who have been found to be owed protection by Australia at risk of prolonged or indefinite immigration detention as a result of the issue of an adverse assessment by ASIO. If enacted, the Bill would leave these refugees unable to obtain a protection visa in Australia and unable to return to their country of origin due to a genuine fear of persecution. Under current policy settings, such refugees are also ineligible for release into community detention arrangements and other forms of conditional release.”

The Abbott government’s decision to restrict the time periods of legislative enquiries is designed to avoid criticism and accountability. The peak body for lawyers in Australia speaks out on an issue, raises legitimate concerns about a bill yet is forced into a short two page submission because of petty politics. 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s